MMM (Marketing Mix Modeling) and MTA (Multi-Touch Attribution) are both marketing measurement methods, but they differ in their approach and scope. MMM provides a macro-level, long-term view of marketing effectiveness by analyzing the overall impact of marketing activities on business outcomes using aggregated data. MTA, on the other hand, offers a granular, real-time analysis of individual customer journeys and the impact of specific touchpoints on conversions.

Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM):
Focus:
MMM focuses on understanding the overall impact of all marketing activities on business outcomes, often using aggregated data like sales figures, marketing spend, and external factors like seasonality.
Scope:
It provides a high-level view of marketing effectiveness, helping with strategic planning and long-term budgeting.
Data:
MMM typically uses historical data, often spanning years, and can incorporate both online and offline marketing channels.
Strengths:
MMM is useful for understanding the impact of offline channels, is privacy-friendly due to its use of aggregated data, and can help with long-term strategic planning.
Weaknesses:
MMM may not be as responsive to rapid market changes or emerging channels and may struggle to capture the impact of new tactics or technologies.

Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA):
Focus:
MTA focuses on tracking individual customer interactions across multiple touchpoints in the customer journey to understand which channels and tactics are most effective in driving conversions.
Scope:
MTA provides granular insights into the customer journey and helps with optimizing digital campaigns in real-time.
Data:
MTA relies on detailed, granular data on individual customer interactions, often requiring sophisticated tracking mechanisms and digital signals.
Strengths:
MTA is useful for optimizing digital campaigns, understanding the effectiveness of specific touchpoints, and identifying micro-moments that influence purchase decisions.
Weaknesses:
MTA can be challenging to implement across different platforms, especially offline channels, and may face challenges with privacy regulations due to its reliance on individual user data

In conclusion, MMM and MTA are complementary measurement methods. MMM offers a broad, strategic view, while MTA provides a granular, tactical view of marketing effectiveness. Many brands use a hybrid approach, leveraging both methods to gain a comprehensive understanding of their marketing performance.

According to a 2024 eMarketer study, improving Media Mix Modeling (MMM) is a top priority for U.S. marketers, with 61% aiming for better or faster MMM capabilities. This is driven by the need for more sophisticated measurement approaches in today’s privacy-focused, multi-channel landscape. MMM, a statistical method with roots dating back to the 1950s and 60s, helps marketers understand the overall impact of various marketing activities on sales and ROI, including both online and offline channels. It’s particularly valuable as digital tracking becomes more limited, and brands rely on a healthy mix of online and offline media. Unlike multi-touch attribution (MTA), which focuses on individual user journeys, MMM provides a high-level, strategic view, using aggregated data to measure the long-term impact of marketing efforts. The rise of open-source projects, like Google’s Meridian, and AI are further advancing MMM, making it more accessible and accurate.

Consumer Bankruptcy filings continue to rise month over month leading many dealerships  reporting a noticeable trend: customers are ready to buy shortly after filing for bankruptcy. These individuals are not the traditional “bad credit” shopper. Many are caught in unforeseen medical expenses or job loss. Many quickly find that they qualify for financing that fits their budget.

The increase in bankruptcy filings opens up new opportunities for dealerships to work with consumers who have been financially strained. Factors such as the return of student loan collections and the end of certain financial modification programs are expected to escalate filings further in the near future. This growing wave of bankruptcy leads has created an uptick in activity with these potential customers. Many lenders are willing to extend credit immediately following bankruptcy filings, presenting an opportunity for dealerships to nurture relationships with these potential buyers. Dealerships ready to embrace this segment of the market, are primed for growth in sales.  Consumer bankruptcy is a bridge to new opportunities.

Translate

Consumer bankruptcy data is a valuable resource for businesses seeking to understand market trends and identify potential customer segments. This data reveals demographics, geographic locations, and even specific types of debt involved in bankruptcy filings, allowing companies to refine their target audience and tailor their marketing messages accordingly.
By using this data, businesses can gain insights into the needs and challenges faced by consumers who have recently gone through or are in the process of a bankruptcy filing. This deeper understanding can help businesses develop products and services that cater to these specific needs, and create compassionate and supportive marketing campaigns that resonate with this audience.